C. Norrie vs L. van Assche — prediction
Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.
Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.
Humid air: the ball loses some speed.
Light wind: no noticeable effect.
Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.
›Ranking: #33 vs #40 (better ranked)
›Head-to-head: 3-0 in favor
›Recent form: 7/10 in recent matches
›More rested: 14d vs opponent's 5d
The model makes C. Norrie the favorite with a 65% win probability, against L. van Assche's 35% — a solid favorite, though Assche keeps real chances. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.54; the offered odds are around @1.46 (a 68% implied), slightly below the market, so the model is a touch more cautious.
Several factors explain the number: #33 vs #40 (better ranked); 3-0 in favor; 7/10 in recent matches; 14d vs opponent's 5d.
Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 65%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~65% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 35 out of every 100 times Assche wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.