MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-08-28
HARD

M. Ristic vs H. Sakatsumeprediction

RISTICWIN PROBABILITYSAKATSUME
59%
model prob.
@2.08
odds · 48% impl.
🎾Serve 61%📈Form 9/10 · 7✓
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature
27°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity
71%

Humid air: the ball loses some speed.

Wind
9 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #195 vs #144

Model 59% vs market 48% → the model sees it as MORE likely than the odds

Recent form: 9/10 in recent matches

On a streak: 7 wins in a row

Match-sharp: 5 matches in the last 2 weeks

Calibrated model probability (~64% out-of-sample accuracy, validated specifically on WTA). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.69
fair odds
+23.4%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes M. Ristic the favorite with a 59% win probability, against H. Sakatsume's 41% — a tight match, without a wide margin. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.69; the offered odds are around @2.08 (a 48% implied), slightly above the market, so the model is a touch more optimistic.

Several factors explain the number: #195 vs #144; model 59% vs market 48% → the model sees it as more likely than the odds; 9/10 in recent matches; 7 wins in a row.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 59%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~64% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 41 out of every 100 times Sakatsume wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →