MODEL PREDICTION · 2026-08-17
HARD

J. Fonseca vs C. O'Connellprediction

✗ Missed
FONSECAWIN PROBABILITYO'CONNELL
87%
model prob.
@1.15
odds · 87% impl.
Rest 1d vs 3dHard 57%🎾Serve 63%📈Form 6/10
CONDITIONS OF THE MATCHin the modelcontext
Surface
Hard

Consistent bounce, medium-fast: neutral conditions, no style favored.

Temperature
28°C

Warm: the ball flies a little more and fitness counts.

Humidity
76%

Very humid air: the ball gets heavy and points stretch out.

Wind
13 km/h

Light wind: no noticeable effect.

Surface feeds the model (surface specialization is one of its factors). Weather and altitude are context we publish for you — they do NOT move the probability.

OUR MODEL'S REASONING

Ranking: #26 vs #129 (better ranked)

Recent form: 6/10 in recent matches

Match-sharp: 4 matches in the last 2 weeks

Calibrated model probability (~65% out-of-sample accuracy). Not a guarantee: the model ≈ the market on average, so the odds already capture almost all the edge. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.15
fair odds
−0.1%
expected value
BREAKDOWN · MODEL ANALYSIS

The model makes J. Fonseca the favorite with a 87% win probability, against C. O'Connell's 13% — a conviction read: the model sees the match clearly leaning one way. Converted to odds, that probability is worth about @1.15; the offered odds are around @1.15 (a 87% implied), virtually the same as what the market prices in.

Several factors explain the number: #26 vs #129 (better ranked); 6/10 in recent matches; 4 matches in the last 2 weeks.

Read it with perspective. Our probability is calibrated — when the model says 87%, that outcome happens roughly that percentage of the time, with ~65% out-of-sample accuracy — but being the favorite is not being the winner: roughly 13 out of every 100 times O'Connell wins. The model also tends to agree with the market, so the odds already capture almost all the edge: don't take it as a sure value. This is informational analysis, not a betting recommendation. 18+ · play responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →