ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-31

T. Cacao vs B. Blaydesprediction

M25 Aldershot
✗ Missed
CACAOWIN PROBABILITYBLAYDES
65%
Elo prob.
@1.48
odds · 68% impl.
📈Form 8/10 · 6✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1590 vs 1484 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 98 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.54
fair odds
−4.1%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Cacao●●●
Elo gap of 106 points (1590 vs 1484) drives the 65% model probability, a clear class edge for Cacao.
Form▸ Cacao●●
Cacao is riding a 6-match win streak (LWWLWWWWWW) versus Blaydes' shorter 2-match run (WLWWWLLLWW).
Rest▸ Blaydes●●
Cacao has played 5 matches in 14 days versus Blaydes' 2, adding fatigue risk despite equal 1-day rest.
Value= Even●●●
Market prices Cacao at 70% (odds 1.42) but the model gives 65%, an -8% EV — no edge here.
CLASS GAP

The 106-point Elo gap (1590 vs 1484) is the clearest signal in this match, translating directly into the model's 65% favorite probability for Cacao. In the ITF tier, a gap of this size typically reflects a meaningful difference in consistency and point-construction quality, even without surface or serve/return data to confirm the mechanism further.

MOMENTUM SPLIT

Cacao's current 6-match win streak (LWWLWWWWWW) stands well ahead of Blaydes' more uneven form (WLWWWLLLWW, streak of 2). This recent trajectory reinforces the Elo-based favoritism, though neither player has recorded a 'quality win' flagged in the data, so the streaks should be read as momentum indicators rather than proof of rising class.

WORKLOAD ASYMMETRY

Both players enter on a single day of rest, so there's no fatigue edge from that angle alone. But Cacao has played 5 matches in the last 14 days against Blaydes' 2 — a meaningfully heavier recent workload that could blunt Cacao's physical sharpness over a longer match, a factor the Elo number alone doesn't capture.

VALUE READ

Being the favorite here is not the same as offering value. The market prices Cacao at an implied 70% (odds of 1.42), while the model's independent estimate is 65% — a gap that produces a -8% expected value. This is also a soft Elo-based market for Challenger/ITF play, where the model's edge over the market is unproven in practice.

On balance, Cacao looks like the stronger player by rating and recent form, but the price already reflects that and then some. There's no backed reason to treat this line as an opportunity — it's a fair or slightly unfavorable price on a likely winner.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →