ITF · ELO ESTIMATE · 2026-07-25

Ja. Delaney vs D. Markovinaprediction

M15 Brisbane
DELANEYWIN PROBABILITYMARKOVINA
67%
Elo prob.
@1.29
odds · 78% impl.
H2H 1–0 Delaney🎾Serve 53%📈Form 7/10 · 3✓
WHAT THE ESTIMATE IS BASED ON

Tour Elo: 1637 vs 1516 — favorite by rating

ITF tier · 407 matches in the favorite's track record

Elo estimate (not the ATP factor model): these are softer, less-analyzed markets

WATCH FOR

!Soft market: the value edge in Challenger/ITF is NOT proven live — treat it as an estimate, not an opportunity.

Tour Elo estimate (Challenger/ITF markets, not covered by the factor model). The value edge here is unproven live — it's a reference, not a recommendation. 18+ · gamble responsibly.
@1.50
fair odds
−13.9%
expected value
HOW EACH FACTOR MATTERS
Level (Elo/ranking)▸ Delaney●●●
Elo edge 1637 vs 1516 gives Delaney a 67% model probability, a solid rating gap in this ITF tier.
Serve/return▸ Delaney
Delaney wins 53% of serve points but just 43% on return; no return data exists for Markovina to compare.
Head-to-head▸ Delaney
Delaney won their only prior meeting in 2026, a small sample but a psychological edge for him.
Form▸ Delaney
Both are on 3-match win streaks; Delaney is 7-3 over his last 10 vs Markovina's 6-4.
Rest▸ Markovina●●
Delaney played 9 matches in 14 days versus Markovina's 4, raising fatigue risk despite equal one-day rest.
Fatigue/Schedule= Even
Both reached the QF at Brisbane one day ago, so deep-run fatigue applies equally to both players.
LEVEL AND FORM

Delaney's Elo rating of 1637 sits well above Markovina's 1516, translating into a 67% model probability in this ITF Brisbane matchup. That gap is reinforced by their sole head-to-head meeting, which Delaney won in 2026, and by the more recent form: Delaney is 7-3 over his last 10 matches compared to Markovina's 6-4, though both currently carry three-match winning streaks.

SERVE PATTERNS

Delaney holds serve at a 53% rate, a modest but functional number for this level, while his own return conversion sits lower at 43%, indicating he leans more on his own service games than on breaking opponents. No serve or return numbers are available for Markovina, so the comparison rests solely on Delaney's tendencies rather than a head-to-head style clash.

SCHEDULE AND FATIGUE

Both players are working with just one day of rest, but the workload differs sharply: Delaney has played nine matches in the last 14 days against Markovina's four. That heavier load raises legitimate fatigue concerns for Delaney, even though both men reached the Brisbane quarterfinals a day ago, an equally shared deep-run fatigue flag that does not tilt the match either way.

VALUE READ

The model prices Delaney at 67% to win, while the market, reflected in odds of 1.29, implies a considerably higher 78% chance, producing a negative expected value of -13.9%. This gap suggests the market is more confident in Delaney than the rating-based model.

With Elo being a soft, less-scrutinized method in Challenger/ITF tennis, treat any edge here as unproven. On balance, Delaney is the more likely winner, but backing him at this price is not a value play.

Impact and analysis from real match data (Elo, form, head-to-head, rest, surface vs baseline, weather, altitude). Soft-market estimate: the value is unproven live. 18+ · gamble responsibly.

Analyze today's matches →